Term recap
October Term 1892 in review
Every writing the Court issued during October Term 1892, as we tracked it in real time: merits decisions with the Reporter's one-line holdings, cert-stage statements, and emergency applications.
251
Merits decisions
0
Cert-stage statements
0
Emergency applications
27
Decision days
The term's first merits decision came down October 17, 1892 and the last on May 15, 1893. The busiest single day was March 6, 1893 with 33 decisions.
Merits decisions, month by month
October 1892 · 4 decisions
November 1892 · 21 decisions
- Earnshaw v. United States
- United States v. Perry
- United States v. Schoverling
- Cross v. Burke
- Foster v. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railroad
- Ware v. Galveston City Co.
- Bellaire v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
- San Pedro & Cañon Del Agua Co. v. United States
- Clyde Mattox v. United States
- Morley v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
- Hardee v. Wilson
- Cook v. Hart
- Stotesbury v. United States
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Denton
- Root v. Third Avenue Railroad
- Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. District of Columbia
- Hamilton Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Hamilton City
- Junge v. Hedden
- Thompson v. Saint Nicholas National Bank
- Toplitz v. Hedden
- Hallinger v. Davis
December 1892 · 28 decisions
- In Re Cross
- Wilmington & Weldon Railroad v. Alsbrook
- Butler v. Goreley
- Benson v. United States
- United States v. Dunnington
- Chicago & Northwestern R. Co. v. Osborne
- In Re Engles
- Balloch v. Hooper
- Lewis v. United States
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois
- Joy v. Adelbert College
- Derby v. Thompson
- Compania Bilbaina De Navegacion, De Bilbao v. Spanish-American Light & Power Co.
- Scott v. Armstrong
- Mitchell v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
- Brinkerhoff v. Aloe
- United States v. Southern Pacific Railroad
- United States v. Colton Marble & Lime Co.
- Huntington v. Attrill
- Potts v. Wallace
- National Tube Works Co. v. Ballou
- Royer v. Coupe
- Cameron v. United States
- McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.
- Brown v. Baxter
- Means v. Bank of Randall
- Lloyd v. Preston
- Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line Commissioners
January 1893 · 37 decisions
- Iowa v. Illinois
- In Re Morrison
- Streeter v. Jefferson County Bank
- Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker
- Lytle v. Lansing
- Albuquerque Bank v. Perea
- Knox County v. Ninth National Bank
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Prentice
- Ankeney v. Hannon
- Fisher v. Shropshire
- Jennings v. Coal Ridge Improvement & Coal Co.
- The City of New York
- UNITED STATES Ex Rel. TRASK v. WANAMAKER
- Holmes v. Goldsmith
- Noble v. Union River Logging Railroad
- Miles v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Decatur
- De La Vergne Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. Featherstone
- Sutliff v. Lake County Commissioners
- Kohn v. McNulta
- Bernier v. Bernier
- Osborne v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
- New Orleans v. Paine
- United States v. Harmon
- Shoemaker v. United States
- Weatherhead v. Coupe
- Luxton v. North River Bridge Co.
- Smithmeyer v. United States
- Glenn v. Garth
- Walter v. Northeastern Railroad
- Keels v. Central R. Co. Of South Carolina
- Cooke v. Avery
- Harman v. Chicago
- Doyle v. Union Pacific Railway Co.
- United Lines Telegraph Co. v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
- Horner v. United States
- Barnett v. Kinney
February 1893 · 7 decisions
March 1893 · 55 decisions
- Hamblin v. Western Land Co.
- Fleitas v. Richardson
- Fleitas v. Richardson
- Hayes v. Pratt
- Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. Harmon's Administrator
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Estill
- Lovell Manufacturing Co. v. Cary
- Taylor v. Brown
- Bauserman v. Blunt
- United States v. Tanner
- United States v. Fletcher
- United States v. Pitman
- United States v. Jones
- United States v. King
- United States v. Erwin
- United States v. Payne
- United States v. Hall
- United States v. McCandless
- United States v. Taylor
- The J. E. Rumbell
- Moelle v. Sherwood
- United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.
- United States v. Dalles Military Road Co.
- Commercial Bank of Pa. v. Armstrong
- May v. Tenney
- Lehnen v. Dickson
- Astiazaran v. Santa Rita Land & Mining Co.
- United States v. Fletcher
- St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
- Virginia v. Paul
- Marx v. Hanthorn
- United States v. Alexander
- Roget v. United States
- United States v. Post
- United States v. Gates
- Bier v. McGehee
- Rosenthal v. Coates
- Indiana v. United States
- In Re Schneider
- Pettibone v. United States
- Passavant v. United States
- In Re Sanborn
- Gaines v. Rugg
- Hume v. Bowie
- Pennsylvania Co. v. Bender
- Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.
- Columbus Watch Co. v. Robbins
- Huber v. Nelson Manufacturing Co.
- Wasatch Mining Co. v. Crescent Mining Co.
- Cameron v. United States
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States
- Ankeny v. Clark
- Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.
- American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co.
- Wolfe v. Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance
April 1893 · 44 decisions
- Ogden v. United States
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. Walker
- Barnum v. Okolona
- People Ex Rel. Schurz v. Cook
- Manhattan Co. v. Blake
- United States v. Old Settlers
- National Hat Pouncing MacHine Co. v. Hedden
- Smith v. Townsend
- Bender v. Pennsylvania Co.
- Virginia v. Tennessee
- Chicot County v. Sherwood
- Lascelles v. Georgia
- Grant v. Walker
- Krementz v. S. Cottle Co.
- United States v. Union Pacific Railway Co.
- German Bank of Memphis v. United States
- Lonergan v. Buford
- Atchison Board of Education v. De Kay
- Swan Land & Cattle Co. v. Frank
- Casement v. Brown
- Humphreys v. Perry
- United States V
- Giozza v. Tiernan
- Martin v. Snyder
- Mexia v. Oliver
- Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.
- Bushnell v. Crooke Mining & Smelting Co.
- Phineas Pam-To-Pee v. United States
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Hoyt
- Bogk v. Gassert
- Paulsen v. Portland
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Powers
- National Meter Co. v. Yonkers Water Commissioners
- Wilson v. United States
- In Re Frederich
- Chandler v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.
- Thomas v. Western Car Co.
- Dobson v. Cubley
- Cairo v. Zane
- The Servia
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. Whalen
- In Re Tyler
- Ex Parte Humes
- Patrick v. Bowman
May 1893 · 55 decisions
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. Pinkney
- United States v. Snyder
- Duer v. Corbin Cabinet Lock Co.
- Underwood v. Gerber
- Pearsall v. Smith
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Anderson
- Hager v. Swayne
- Shaeffer v. Blair
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. McKeen
- Abadie v. United States
- United States v. Jones
- Nash v. Harshman
- Int. St. Com. Comm'n v. Atchison &C. Railroad
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Elliott
- United States v. Mock
- United States v. Humphries
- United States v. Dumas
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Baugh
- Leggett v. Standard Oil Co.
- Moses v. Lawrence County Bank
- Nix v. Hedden
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare Railroad
- Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.
- Wade v. Chicago, Springfield & St. Louis Railroad
- Hedden v. Richard
- Cadwalader v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.
- Hobbie v. Jennison
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Emmons
- Metropolitan Bank v. St. Louis Dispatch Co.
- Cates v. Allen
- Bibb v. Allen
- Ide v. Ball Engine Co.
- Brigham v. Coffin
- Coats v. Merrick Thread Co.
- Sheffield Furnace Co. v. Witherow
- Loeber v. Schroeder
- Hollender v. Magone
- Evans v. Stettnisch
- Byers v. McAuley
- MINNEAPOLIS AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. Nelson
- St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
- Porter v. Sabin
- Pickett v. Foster
- Cadwalader v. Wanamaker
- Walker v. Seeberger
- Hartranft v. Meyer
- Hill v. United States
- McComb v. Frink
- McNulty v. California
- Vincent v. California
- Shute v. Keyser
- Carr v. Quigley
- Curtner v. United States
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Goodridge
- Fong Yue Ting v. United States
Want next term the moment it happens? Get email alerts for every decision, usually within minutes of release.
Holding lines are from the syllabi prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and are not part of the Court's opinions. Case data from supremecourt.gov and CourtListener (Free Law Project). SCOTUS Alerts is an independent project, not affiliated with the U.S. Supreme Court.