Term recap
October Term 1893 in review
Every writing the Court issued during October Term 1893, as we tracked it in real time: merits decisions with the Reporter's one-line holdings, cert-stage statements, and emergency applications.
288
Merits decisions
0
Cert-stage statements
0
Emergency applications
27
Decision days
The term's first merits decision came down October 16, 1893 and the last on May 26, 1894. The busiest single day was March 5, 1894 with 32 decisions.
Merits decisions, month by month
October 1893 · 18 decisions
- Wells v. Goodnow's Administrator
- United States v. Denver & Rio Grande Railway Co.
- United States v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad
- New York & Texas Land Co. v. Votaw
- Wood v. Brady
- Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings
- Bushnell v. Crooke Mining & Smelting Co.
- Corbin Cabinet Lock Co. v. Eagle Lock Co.
- Magone v. Heller
- Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong
- Moore v. United States
- Collins v. United States
- Hall v. United States
- Holder v. United States
- United States v. Patterson
- United States v. Baird
- Gordon v. Warder
- Schuyler Nat. Bank v. Bollong. Three Cases
November 1893 · 32 decisions
- Miller's Executors v. Swann
- Rader's Administrator v. Maddox
- Ball & Socket Fastener Co. v. Kraetzer
- Empire Coal & Transportation Co. v. Empire Coal & Mining Co.
- Morse v. Anderson
- Brown v. United States
- Graves v. United States
- United States v. Late Corp. of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
- Colorado Central Consolidated Mining Co. v. Turck
- Wager v. Providence Insurance
- Mississippi Mills v. Cohn
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. Locke
- Gibson v. Peters
- Hedges v. Dixon County
- Howard v. Detroit Stove Works
- Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.
- Sturm v. Boker
- Seney v. Wabash Western Railway Co.
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.
- United States v. Rodgers
- United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.
- Thompson v. Sioux Falls National Bank
- Knapp v. Morss
- Elliott v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
- Eustis v. Bolles
- McDaid v. Oklahoma Territory Ex Rel. Smith
- Gardner v. Michigan Central Railroad
- Root v. Woolworth
- Jacobs v. George
- In Re Lennon
- Hicks v. United States
- Magin v. Karle
December 1893 · 25 decisions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Akens
- McAleer v. United States
- Columbia Mill Co. v. Alcorn
- Saltonstall, Collector of Customs v. Birtwell
- Kinkead v. United States
- Powell v. Brunswick County
- Insley v. United States
- Allen v. United States
- Lees v. United States
- Seeberger v. Hardy
- Mullett's Administratrix v. United States
- Ide v. United States
- Long v. Thayer
- Farley v. Hill
- Turner v. Sawyer
- Belknap v. United States
- Latta v. Kilbourn
- In Re Swan
- Ward v. Cochran
- Horn v. Detroit Dry Dock Co.
- Giles v. Heysinger
- Belden v. Chase
- In Re Hohorst
- Lehigh Zinc and Iron Company v. Bamford
- Hammond v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.
January 1894 · 49 decisions
- Famous Smith v. United States
- Hardenbergh v. Ray
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Johnson
- Inglehart v. Stansbury
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Volk
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Saunders
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Horn
- Wilson v. Oswego Township
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
- Voorhees v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Co.
- Aztec Mining Co. v. Ripley
- Central Trust Co. v. McGeorge
- Tucker v. United States
- Cadwalader v. Zeh
- Bates v. Preble
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.
- Wollensak v. Sargent
- Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. Adams
- Southworth v. United States
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Lowell
- Halliday v. Stuart
- In Re Bonner
- Davis v. Utah Territory
- Baltimore Traction Co. v. Baltimore Belt Railroad
- Sheffield & Birmingham Coal, Iron & Railway Co. v. Gordon
- Haughey v. Lee
- Gottlieb v. Thatcher
- Iowa v. Illinois
- Fort Worth City Co. v. Smith Bridge Co.
- Hickory v. United States
- Meddaugh v. Wilson
- Crescent Mining Co. v. Wasatch Mining Co.
- California Powder Works v. Davis
- Garner v. Second Nat. Bank of Providence
- Maynard v. Hecht
- Pointer v. United States
- Moran v. Hagerman
- United States v. Alger
- United States v. Stahl
- Werner v. Charleston
- Merchants' Cotton Press & Storage Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Gonzales
- Mammoth Mining Co. v. Salt Lake Foundry & MacHine Co.
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos County
- Chapman v. Handley
- Lincoln v. Power
- De Arnaud v. United States
- United States v. Hutchins
- Columbus Southern Railway Co. v. Wright
February 1894 · 13 decisions
- Newport Light Co. v. Newport
- Maxwell Land Grant Co. v. Dawson
- United States v. La Tourrette
- Bryan v. Board of Ed. of Ky. Conference of Methodist Episcopal Church, South
- Shauer v. Alterton
- Dower v. Richards
- Buckstaff v. Russell
- Lewis v. Wilson
- Hedden v. Robertson
- Lewis v. Monson
- United States v. Thomas
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
- New York & New England Railroad v. Bristol
March 1894 · 52 decisions
- Caha v. United States
- McBroom v. Scottish Mortgage & Land Investment Co.
- Coleman v. United States
- Johnson Co. v. Wharton
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Seley
- United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad
- Dunlap v. Schofield
- Miller v. Courtnay
- Montana Co. v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.
- King v. Amy & Silversmith Mining Co.
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. Everett
- Hutchinson Investment Co. v. Caldwell
- Louisville, Evansville, & St. Louis Railroad v. Clarke
- Cincinnati Siemens-Lungren Gas Illuminating Co. v. Western Siemens-Lungren Co.
- Lawton v. Steele
- Dowell v. Applegate
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonald
- Lazarus v. Phelps
- Plant Investment Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co.
- Carne v. Russ
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Roberts
- The Main v. Williams
- Belding Manufacturing Co. v. Challenge Corn Planter Co.
- Rowe v. Phelps
- El Paso Water Company v. El Paso
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Schumacher
- Snell v. Chicago
- Schlesinger v. Kansas City & Southern Railway
- United States v. Shea
- Gumaer v. Colorado Oil Co.
- Shively v. Bowlby
- Prosser v. Northern Pacific Railroad
- Duncan v. Missouri
- Keokuk & Western Railroad v. Missouri
- Keokuk & Western Railroad v. Scotland County
- Maddock v. Magone
- Berbecker v. Robertson
- Western National Bank v. Armstrong
- Keokuk & Western Railroad v. Scotland County
- Israel v. Arthur
- Michigan v. Flint & Père Marquette Railroad
- Murphy v. Packer
- Halstead v. Grinnan
- McKittrick v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.
- Corinne Mill, Canal & Stock Co. v. Toponce
- City Bank of Fort Worth v. Hunter
- United States v. Bashaw
- United States v. Alger
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' Bank
- Manuel v. Wulff
- MacLay v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
April 1894 · 44 decisions
- Dealy v. United States
- Robertson v. Chapman
- Huntley v. Kingman
- Hardt v. Heidweyer
- Herrman v. Robertson
- Seabury v. Am Ende
- Sargent v. Covert
- Burck v. Taylor
- North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.
- Seeberger v. Schlesinger
- Bogle v. Magone
- Worthington v. Boston
- Saltonstall v. Russell
- Presson v. Russell
- Davis v. Mercantile Trust Co.
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. Booth
- Sarlls v. United States
- Schoenfeld v. Hendricks
- United States v. Pridgeon
- United States v. Shields
- Lowndes v. Huntington
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Daniels
- West v. Cabell
- The Martello
- Seeberger v. Castro
- Spalding v. Castro
- Wilson v. Haley Live Stock Co.
- Gourko v. United States
- Wharton v. Wise
- United States v. Klingenberg
- Hegler v. Faulkner
- Morgan v. Daniels
- Burke v. Dulaney
- Erhardt v. Steinhardt
- Lutz v. Magone
- Blitz v. United States
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. Clark
- The Edwin I. Morrison
- Runkle v. Burnham
- Hanrick v. Hanrick
- Mann v. Tacoma Land Co.
- Baer v. Moran Brothers Co.
- State of California v. Southern Pac. Co
- Brennan v. Titusville
May 1894 · 55 decisions
- Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Tennessee
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Charleston
- Luxton v. North River Bridge Co.
- Mason v. Pewabic Mining Co.
- Roberts v. Lewis
- Starr v. United States
- South Carolina v. Seymour
- Miller v. Texas
- McKane v. Durston
- Eagle Insurance v. Ohio
- Metcalf v. Watertown
- Loud v. Pomona Land & Water Co.
- Marchant v. Pennsylyania Railroad
- Gates Iron Works v. Fraser
- Seymour v. Slide & Spur Gold Mines
- Lyons v. Woods
- Groves v. Sentell
- Slide & Spur Gold Mines v. Seymour
- Seeberger v. Schweyer
- Stewart v. Barnes
- Anvil Mining Co. v. Humble
- Chicago Deposit Vault Co. v. McNulta
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Pennsylvania
- Brass v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Stoeser
- Ashley v. Ryan
- Scott v. McNeal
- Connecticut Ex Rel. New York & New England R. Co. v. Woodruff
- New Orleans v. Benjamin
- Evans v. United States
- In Re Lockwood
- Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Kentucky
- Covington & Cincinnati Elevated Railroad & Transfer & Bridge Co. v. Kentucky
- St. Clair v. United States
- Reagan v. Mercantile Trust Co.
- The Haytian Republic
- Reagan v. Mercantile Trust Co.
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
- Morrison v. Watson
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. Hambly
- Constable v. National Steamship Co.
- Dunham v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. McFadden
- Prentice v. Northern Pacific Railroad
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. Babcock
- Balkam v. Woodstock Iron Co.
- United States v. Illinois Central Railroad
- Riggles v. Erney
- Northern Pacific Railroad Company v. Patterson
- Primrose v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
- Barden v. Northern Pacific Railroad
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson
- Moran v. Sturges
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Backus
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Backus
Want next term the moment it happens? Get email alerts for every decision, usually within minutes of release.
Holding lines are from the syllabi prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and are not part of the Court's opinions. Case data from supremecourt.gov and CourtListener (Free Law Project). SCOTUS Alerts is an independent project, not affiliated with the U.S. Supreme Court.