Term recap
October Term 1898 in review
Every writing the Court issued during October Term 1898, as we tracked it in real time: merits decisions with the Reporter's one-line holdings, cert-stage statements, and emergency applications.
174
Merits decisions
0
Cert-stage statements
0
Emergency applications
27
Decision days
The term's first merits decision came down October 17, 1898 and the last on October 1, 1899. The busiest single day was February 20, 1899 with 23 decisions.
Merits decisions, month by month
October 1898 · 15 decisions
- The G. R. Booth
- Hubbard v. Tod
- Briggs v. Walker
- California National Bank v. Thomas
- California National Bank v. Stateler
- The Silvia
- Northwestern Bank v. Freeman
- Anderson v. United States
- Hopkins v. United States
- Brown v. United States
- Naeglin v. De Cordoba
- United States v. Joint Traffic Assn.
- Pierce v. Somerset Railway
- New York State v. Roberts
- St. Louis Mining & Milling Co. v. Montana Mining Co.
November 1898 · 6 decisions
December 1898 · 9 decisions
January 1899 · 31 decisions
- Fitts v. McGhee
- United States v. Bliss
- Clark v. Kansas City
- Sonnentheil v. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co.
- Simpson v. United States
- United States v. Buffalo Natural Gas Fuel Co.
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. Krumseig
- Capital National Bank v. First National Bank
- Scott v. United States
- United States v. Ingram
- Washington Market Co. v. District of Columbia
- Utter v. Franklin
- Bellingham Bay & British Columbia RailRoad v. New Whatcom
- Home for Incurables v. Noble
- Bellingham Bay Imp. Co. v. City of New Whatcom (Two Cases)
- Keck v. United States
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Long Island Loan & Trust Co.
- Chappell Chemical & Fertilizer Co. v. Sulphur Mines Co.
- Columbia Water Power Co. v. Columbia Electric Street Railway Light & Power Co.
- Chappell Chemical & Fertilizer Co. v. Sulphur Mines Co.
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. Jones
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Lansden
- Orient Insurance v. Daggs
- United States v. Harsha
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Myers
- First Nat. Bank of Grand Forks v. Anderson
- United States v. Duell
- Hoeninghaus v. United States
- Marshall v. Burtis
- McQuade v. Trenton
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Spratley
February 1899 · 29 decisions
- McIntire v. Pryor
- Nugent v. Arizona Improvement Co.
- Lomax v. Pickering
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Joy
- Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co. v. Patten Paper Co.
- Henrietta Mining & Milling Co. v. Gardner
- Wilson v. Eureka City
- Central Loan & Trust Co. v. Campbell Commission Co.
- Covington v. Kentucky
- Mullen v. Western Union Beef Co.
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad
- Lake County Commissioners v. Dudley
- Gunnison County Commissioners v. Rollins
- Calhoun v. Violet
- Sioux City Terminal Railroad & Warehouse Co. v. Trust Co. of North America
- Bausman v. Dixon
- Towson v. Moore
- Dunlap v. United States
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Clayton
- Collier v. United States
- United States v. Navarre
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Ohio
- Merrill v. National Bank of Jacksonville
- Dewey v. Des Moines
- First National Bank of Wellington v. Chapman
- Henrietta Mining & Milling Co. v. Johnson
- New Orleans v. Quinlan
- Ohio v. Thomas
- United States v. Johnson
March 1899 · 10 decisions
April 1899 · 26 decisions
- Guthrie National Bank v. Guthrie
- Cooper v. Newell
- Allen v. Southern Pacific Railroad
- Owensboro National Bank v. Owensboro
- Deposit Bank of Owensboro v. Owensboro
- Duluth & Iron Range Railroad v. Roy
- Guarantee Co. v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.
- Medbury v. United States
- The Chattahoochee
- Pope v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.
- HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY v. Henderson City
- Blythe v. Hinckley
- Brown v. Hitchcock
- Citizens' Savings Bank of Owensboro v. Owensboro
- Nicol v. Ames
- Capital Traction Co. v. Hof
- Kirby v. United States
- Security Trust Co. v. Dodd, Mead & Co.
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Matthews
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Smith
- Holmes v. Hurst
- Cosgrove v. Winney
- United States v. One Distillery
- Auten v. United States Nat. Bank of NY
- American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Hall
- White v. Leovy
May 1899 · 47 decisions
- Bosworth v. St. Louis Terminal Railroad Assn.
- Humphries v. District of Columbia
- McCain v. Des Moines
- Moran v. Dillingham
- Kimball v. Kimball
- Morris v. United States
- Nelson v. Moloney
- Louisville v. the Bank of Commerce
- Cohn v. Daley
- New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.
- Concord First National Bank v. Hawkins
- United States v. Krall
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. Freeman
- Price v. United States & Osage Indians
- Office Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Fenton Metallic Manufacturing Co.
- McDonald v. Williams
- Israel v. Gale
- Wade v. Travis County
- Raton Waterworks Co. v. Town of Ration
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.
- Stone v. Bank of Commerce
- Louisville v. Third National Bank
- National Bank of Louisville v. Stone, Auditor
- Stephens v. Cherokee Nation
- The Olinde Rodrigues
- Louisville v. Bank of Louisville
- Louisville v. Citizens' National Bank
- Stone, Auditor v. Farmers' Bank of Kentucky. Farmers' Bank of Kentucky v. Stone, Auditor
- First Nat. Bank of Louisville v. Louisville
- United States v. Dudley
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McCann
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. De Lacey
- Oakes v. United States
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Campbell
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Sturm
- McDonald v. Chemical National Bank
- Davis v. Coblens
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. National City
- Rio Grande Irrigation & Colonization Co. v. Gildersleeve
- Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.
- Richmond v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
- McMullen v. Hoffman
- Spurr v. United States
- Columbus Construction Co. v. Crane Co.
- West Co. v. Lea
- United States v. Coe
October 1899 · 1 decision
Want next term the moment it happens? Get email alerts for every decision, usually within minutes of release.
Holding lines are from the syllabi prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and are not part of the Court's opinions. Case data from supremecourt.gov and CourtListener (Free Law Project). SCOTUS Alerts is an independent project, not affiliated with the U.S. Supreme Court.