Term recap
October Term 1901 in review
Every writing the Court issued during October Term 1901, as we tracked it in real time: merits decisions with the Reporter's one-line holdings, cert-stage statements, and emergency applications.
179
Merits decisions
0
Cert-stage statements
0
Emergency applications
26
Decision days
The term's first merits decision came down October 21, 1901 and the last on June 2, 1902. The busiest single day was June 2, 1902 with 27 decisions.
Merits decisions, month by month
October 1901 · 4 decisions
November 1901 · 6 decisions
December 1901 · 9 decisions
January 1902 · 36 decisions
- National Foundry & Pipe Works v. Oconto Water Supply Co.
- Capital City Dairy Co. v. Ohio
- The Kensington
- Orr v. Gilman
- Schrimpscher v. Stockton
- Gallup v. Schmidt
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.
- Carter v. McClaughry
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.
- Tucker v. Alexandroff
- Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Reynolds
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Kentucky
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United States
- United States Trust Co. v. New Mexico
- Ex Parte Wilder's Steamship Company
- Minder v. Georgia
- McKinley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United Mining Co.
- Maese v. Herman
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Zernecke
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Eaton
- United States Repair & Guarantee Co. v. Assyrian Asphalt Co.
- Greene v. Henkel
- Nutting v. Massachusetts
- Midway Co. v. Eaton
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Reiss
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Callender
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. Moore
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. Bell
- Otto Groeck, Appts. v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company
- Louisville and Jeffersonville Ferry Company v. Kentucky
- Mueller v. Nugent
- Howard v. United States
- Louisville Trust Co. v. Comingor
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Eubank
- United States v. Southern Pacific Railroad
- King v. Portland City
February 1902 · 21 decisions
- McDonald v. Thompson
- Illinois v. Illinois Central Railroad
- Brainard v. Buck
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. Lander
- Voigt v. Detroit City
- United States v. Barlow
- United States v. Ewing
- Lake Benton First National Bank v. Watt
- League v. Texas
- Lykins v. McGrath
- Marande v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.
- United States v. St. Louis & Mississippi Valley Transportation Co.
- Studebaker v. Perry
- Terlinden v. Ames
- Huguley Manufacturing Co. v. Galeton Cotton Mills
- In Re Huguley Manufacturing Company and Alabama & Georgia Manufacturing Company
- Waite v. Santa Cruz
- O'BRIEN v. Wheelock
- United States v. Baca
- Hatfield v. King
March 1902 · 26 decisions
- Clark v. Titusville
- Rothschild v. Knight
- Schuerman v. Arizona
- Skaneateles Water Works Co. v. Skaneateles
- Detroit v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.
- Wilson v. Standefer
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.
- Booth v. Illinois
- Goodrich v. Detroit
- United States v. Martinez
- Tullock v. Mulvane
- Monroe v. United States
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Elliott
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.
- United States v. Camou
- Eidman v. Martinez
- Moore v. Ruckgaber
- Busch v. Jones
- Patton v. Brady
- Reloj Cattle Co. v. United States
- Ainsa v. United States
- Arivaca Land & Cattle Co. v. United States
- Emblen v. Lincoln Land Co.
- Iron Gate Bank v. Brady
- Gwin v. United States
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Shepard
April 1902 · 25 decisions
- Stockard v. Morgan
- Sweringen v. St. Louis
- French-Glenn Live Stock Co. v. Springer
- French-Glenn Live Stock Co. v. Colwell
- Wilson v. Iseminger
- Vicksburg Waterworks Co. v. Vicksburg
- Rodgers v. United States
- New York City v. Pine
- Filhiol v. Maurice
- Michigan Sugar Co. v. Michigan
- Eastern Building and Loan Assn. v. Ebaugh
- McIntosh v. Aubrey
- Kansas v. Colorado
- Erie Railroad v. Purdy
- Hitz v. Jenks
- Talbot v. Sioux City First National Bank
- Daniel H. Talbot, Plff. In Err. v. Sioux National Bank of Sioux City, Iowa
- St. Louis Consolidated Coal Co. v. Illinois
- United States v. Borcherling
- United States v. Pendell
- United States v. Lee Yen Tai
- United States v. Finnell
- Washington State v. Northern Securities Co.
- United States v. Green
- Covington v. Covington First National Bank
May 1902 · 25 decisions
- Excelsior Wooden Pipe Co. v. Pacific Bridge Co.
- Fok Yung Yo v. United States
- Lee Gon Yung v. United States
- Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. Mettler
- New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana
- Woodworth v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
- Travellers' Insurance v. Connecticut
- Minnesota v. Hitchcock
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.
- Swafford v. Templeton
- United States v. Copper Queen Mining Co.
- Southwestern Coal Co. v. McBride
- McFaddin v. Evans-Snider-Buel Co.
- The Styria, Scopinich v. Munroe
- Montana M. Co. v. ST. LOUIS M. & M. CO.
- Emsheimer v. New Orleans
- McClaughry v. Deming
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.
- Beyer v. LeFevre
- Felsenheld v. United States
- Bowker v. United States
- Ward v. Joslin
- Nesbitt v. United States
- Williams v. Gaylord
- Murphy v. Utter
June 1902 · 27 decisions
- Lee Lung v. Patterson
- Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank
- Hatfield v. King
- Hanover National Bank v. Moyses
- Chin Bak Kan v. United States
- Denver First National Bank v. Klug
- Clark v. Herington
- Bienville Water Supply Co. v. Mobile
- Jenkins v. Neff
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Manning
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Minnesota
- New York Central Railroad v. New York
- Hoffeld v. United States
- Pine River Logging Co. v. United States
- United States v. Nichols
- Kennard v. Nebraska
- United States v. Freel
- Inter. Com. Commis'n v. CHICAGO & C. R'D CO.
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Courtney
- Warner v. Godfrey
- Compagnie Francaise De Navigation a Vapeur v. Louisiana State Board of Health
- Capital City Light & Fuel Co. v. Tallahassee
- Hotema v. United States
- Hagan v. Scottish Insurance
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Penn Plate Glass Co.
- Lander v. Mercantile Bank
- Hardy v. United States
Want next term the moment it happens? Get email alerts for every decision, usually within minutes of release.
Holding lines are from the syllabi prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and are not part of the Court's opinions. Case data from supremecourt.gov and CourtListener (Free Law Project). SCOTUS Alerts is an independent project, not affiliated with the U.S. Supreme Court.